I realize these restrictions were already eased but... I don't see how any locale can restrict religious service if it has indoor dining or bars open. If anything, the former can be done with masks. That said, it should be noted that singing/choir indoors is especially high-risk.https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1331838731893043201 …
-
-
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/sbs/businesses/covid19-business-tips-faqs.page#essential … Apparently the supremes made reference to bike shops, but I haven't read the ruling. Bike shops in NYC are absolutely essential, as food delivery workers rely on them.pic.twitter.com/EhavQsffx7
-
Here's the reference:https://twitter.com/seabikeblog/status/1332006484482297857 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think liquor stores are the one people complain about the most (including Gorsuch). But buying wine is much lower risk than going to church.
-
I get the liquor store complaint since liquor is not healthy. But the obvious result of a liquor store closure would be people packing liquor stores before the closures and then crossing state lines or buying on the secondary market so costing them would be counterproductive
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't bars and restaurants being closed negate your entire point?
-
No. They were open until very recently. With what justification?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think we have been using a measure that combines risk with "usefulness," or what harms come from closing something. This has been very confusing to people but isn't it something we need to do? I understand that people see usefulness differently, but one could set parameters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.