It's especially infuriating as the AstraZeneca/Oxford one has less-strict storage requirements and thus is more likely to be used in poorer countries. There is no excuse for messing with public trust in a pandemic. They should immediately publish all the details we need.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn’t the key fact to report just that no one got seriously ill who had the vaccine, rather than trying to get an efficiency number as high as the others (which is what it kind of seems like they’re doing)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you don’t understand British understatement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I loved the piece and it will be in my newsletter next week.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A peer-reviewed paper on this vaccine is definitely due.
-
Like the one published within the last week perhaps?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.