I think the farhad column is useful in that it shows that people are perfectly capable of making the “wrong” (honestly he seems pretty low on the risk spectrum for gatherings) decision even if they have all the relevant information, financial security etc
-
-
Replying to @MattZeitlin
This is piggybacking off a
@mattyglesias point but I think it shows the problem is that a lot of COVID behavior which may be rational from an individual's standpoint can nonetheless cause negative externalities for society.22 replies 17 retweets 479 likes -
I'd put "indoor dining" in that category, but wouldn't put "self-isolating for two weeks and then driving to a city to eat an outdoor meal with seven people" in that category. The latter is actually literally harmless.
11 replies 3 retweets 120 likes -
Replying to @davidshor @NateSilver538 and
That was not at all what the first version of the column was though. It’s been majorly-edited. The first version was I don’t have a bubble but I had no idea, and the only precaution was kids will be pulled from learning pod for a week.
3 replies 0 retweets 85 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @davidshor and
I don’t mind people doing low risk activities as they see fit, of course. Issue was very publicly shrugging off something that is very important for people to understand: bubbles aren’t bubbles unless they’re *actually* bubbles. Few people have intuitive grasp of network theory.
8 replies 4 retweets 105 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @davidshor and
I think people understand pretty well their social bubbles are not pristine. It's mostly a euphemism to say "everybody's being *pretty* careful here, right?". Or it's hygenie theater to defend the choice to see other people in person when you think you might get scolded for it.
3 replies 1 retweet 44 likes -
Replying to @NateSilver538 @davidshor and
Actually, I thought that was the real value of the column. He thought he was in a bubble. I mean, the moment he said "kids in learning pod plus gym class", you knew he wasn't. That's not a bubble! It's an open network! But he professed his shock, but kept calling it bubble.
4 replies 3 retweets 112 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @NateSilver538 and
I remember the NSA "hop" discussions after Snowden revelations. Turns out NSA could go three hops from an initial contact! And I remember trying to explain to people what three hops could mean and blowing their minds with how large it got, how quickly. It's not intuitive.
1 reply 5 retweets 39 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Haven’t seen!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.