I think the farhad column is useful in that it shows that people are perfectly capable of making the “wrong” (honestly he seems pretty low on the risk spectrum for gatherings) decision even if they have all the relevant information, financial security etc
-
-
I did read it post-editing to be fair
-
Yeah. Total change. Two articles that should have been separate. 1-" Holy crap, I had no idea how networks work. Please learn from my ignorance in this moment of crisis." 2- "Like so many, I have important needs and I asked experts how to fulfill them with least amount of risk."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
right didn't say this before, for example: "will all probably quarantine for a couple of weeks after we return." Side note: anyone have a clue why
@nyt_diff etc only pick up some stories? -
I don't know and I'm actually glad they edited it. It makes it harder to understand why people got mad in the first place but that's not important. If anyone encounters it now, it is less bad though it is still incoherent. (No way to salvage that).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is that, ethical? Is that why the piece goes on and on?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.