Not only is this not correct, it’s a great disservice to one area these countries excelled: the science. They had scientists who understood airborne transmission and key role of ventilation and superspreading early on, along with explaining correctly reason for masks.https://twitter.com/NickKristof/status/1324875370542358529 …
-
-
Nicaragua and Uruguay also appear to have done very well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Variation in social interactions (both in number and nature) or (more speculatively?) exposure to other pathogens could play a role in susceptibility differences—a priori I would not expect R0 to be very similar across countries. After early well-deserved attention on the... 1/3
-
the strategies in some successful places, the next step should have been a careful quantitative study of how things are really working there. In some cases this requires data that I'm not even sure has been made public. For example, I would like to know for each country:2/3
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.