You think there’s no value added from expertise in “Foreign policy, or economics, or Public health policy”??? That’s ... wow. There are questions in those domains that are political, and belong to the public. That something different.
-
-
I mean, if I had to pick the most striking example for experts allowed practically no control over their own specific area, I'd have picked pilots probably. Yet, to you, it looks like control and "hard expertise" ruling over their own domain. That's what I mean.
-
“Expertise” in regulation over soft domains is much different than similar “expertise” in regulation over hard domains. Eg enforcement arms generally have very substantial hard knowledge and drafters of regulation consult them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But that's not the decision point that matters, and not even true. An average PhD in public health will do immeasurably better than average person for health; and the reason a pilot can fly well is because we don't let pilots make decisions that matter except narrow execution.
- Show replies
-
-
-
the higher accident rate in general aviation is due to less training, less maintenance, inherently more dangerous operations (e.g. single-pilot and VFR), less attention to important factors like proficiency "pilots having major operational control" is not a major factor
-
and, hell, you're wrong even about Part 121 aviation the pilot in command is the final authority for all decisions concerning the flight from takeoff to landing, he's king, just like in GA
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.