Not to mention, and she won't be offended by my saying this, @zeynep is not a trained expert in virology or epidemiology or anything like that. She is just a rigorous intellectual and a talented social science scholar. And a great columnist as a result.
-
-
Not at all offended. I have the skills to read the scientific papers & talk to experts. I read about 100+ papers for each of these pieces I've written, and then put in a lot of work to produce the knowledge (a lot of it doesn't pre-exist, needs synthesis) and to write it clearly.
3 replies 2 retweets 85 likes -
I'm glad you put it this way. Often when this kind of work is described the term used is "translate," as in translating the scientific literature into plain English. But that's not the right metaphor.
3 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Translate? I wish there was ready-made work to translate. *lolsob*. I've been doing a good deal of the putting together myself, and that's why I'm writing these pieces and the people focusing on "translating" science by interviewing experts aren't. Not how it works right now.
2 replies 1 retweet 32 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @jayrosen_nyu and
As is usually the case with women, many assume I merely "translate" what some experts are telling me. Lol. The experts don't agree; the papers are preliminary, and the knowledge is emerging. I'm not a good writer! Not my native language. It's my synthesis that's doing the work.
4 replies 2 retweets 56 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @jayrosen_nyu and
I read all the papers; I judge the methods, findings and statistics; I judge the expert proclamations and discard a whole amount because I judge them wrong; I put implications of many different findings together and I make claims on where the science is... It's not "translating."
3 replies 3 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @jayrosen_nyu and
It's definitely different than being a domain expert in one of the individual fields, and I don't claim to be one. Not sure if it has a name, but I will absolutely claim a form of expertise and skill that's not "science communication." Dunno. Doing it because it needs doing.
8 replies 0 retweets 37 likes -
We need a better word for "desiloization," which isn't even a word.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Yeah don't have a word for it. Pandemic hit, looked around and jumped in because it was missing and I had the space and the support to try to fill that gap.
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @jayrosen_nyu and
Thank you from another reader. Your clear writing (on masks, relative risks, and on ventilation) has helped me and my family make better decisions throughout this year. Grateful.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
I'm so glad to hear it's been useful. That's my hope and goal!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.