This frightening outbreak highlights one of the most important challenges for the cheap, rapid testing approach that @michaelmina_lab and others have proposed: creating a false sense of security that causes people to violate other guidelines, putting themselves and others at risk
-
-
I’m not going to defend team clown but I’m not sure all tools are likely to work the same way. In particular, a test that says everyone in this room is negative is going to change behavior more profoundly than people with masks thinking they can play loose with social distancing.
-
What’s amazing for surveillance seems maybe less good for parties.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
other safety tools don't have super-spreader potential (e.g., the 5% of people who drive more aggressively with ABS don't put 20x more at risk) also others don't seem to promise return to normalcy. stakes very different. I get argument & largely agree but we should be cautious
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.