My thread from last night focused on the implications of the @nytimes article for the legitimacy of the @WHO. (I shouldn’t have left off @selamgkidan from the list of writers, btw.) But there are also implications for how the press (and all of us) should be asking questions. 1/9https://twitter.com/jbentonheath/status/1311467997681405952 …
-
-
That’s fascinating. I had thought it was an empty talking point (“may create”=“we have no idea”) designed to paper over the real concern about a run on supplies/hoarding/price gouging. I wouldn’t have suspected anyone was dug in on it as an actual theory of human behavior.
-
It has been touted widely—in that key committee and also by many other medical health authorities including medical doctors of great renown, leading epidemiologists etc.—and in many cases, it has been utterly impossible to get them to look at the evidence and see it was nonsense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.