Exactly. I don’t see what’s new about this guidance. It sure doesn’t seem like the huge shift people are calling it. Seems like we’re splitting hairs unless control measures are changed.https://twitter.com/SaskiaPopescu/status/1307802198546423809 …
-
-
That's why I think it's not a big deal to the experts but a big deal for how community measures. Some schools are still closing a whole day, pushing kids into haphazard childcare, increasing network links and infection risk because.. they deep clean then. But no open windows. /n
-
100% all of this. Many school districts are still interpreting guidance to mean distancing students allows for masks to safely come off for extended periods. This is in NY, where reopening has otherwise been very measured.https://spectrumlocalnews.com/share/nys/central-ny/ny-state-of-politics/2020/08/31/schools-have-mask-wearing-flexibility--worrying-parents-?cid=app_share …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Spain’s leading scientific org
@CSIC still denies aerosol transmission: “solo el contacto directo persona a persona permite su dispersión.” From page 37: https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/218312/3/INFORME_Cov19_PTI_Salud_Global_CSIC_v3.pdf …pic.twitter.com/58RWpaKvxV
-
Yep. People don't believe me because the expert conversation has moved past it but official WHO guidelines still say no masks necessary indoors if people are separated by three feet—and that's what many health authorities around the world are using to create their own guidelines.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.