why didn’t NBA players use the term “strike” to describe yesterday’s actions? I think it’s because “strike” has strong labor connotations that the players want to avoid on the eve of renegotiating their collective bargaining agreement
-
-
fair enough. It will be interesting to see what comes out of these meetings today. Can the players all get on the same page? And will the NBA board of governors support them? This could easily turn into a labor dispute on top of a political statement
-
what is interesting is that while the NBA commissioner is on the same page, players still want owners to take a stronger stance. I wonder if they will make specific demands before they get back on the court.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.