In mid-July, a large study out of South Korea seemed to suggest that children over the age of 10 spread coronavirus even more than adults do; this update to the same study clarifies otherwise:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/health/older-children-and-the-coronavirus-a-new-wrinkle-in-the-debate.html …
-
-
I’m not talking about that paper on its own, but rather at where the bulk of the evidence points. As
@apsmunro and@BillHanage rightly point out. -
The study itself tells us nothing new because of design though, it is not interpretable for transmission direction which is what everyone wants to know more about (me too!). It should not have had a single article on it without more details.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But I strongly object to trying to pin all problems on a single reporter! The study itself was badly-worded (even though the details somewhat made it clear there were problems) and had so little details that it was hard to figure it out, and it was *widely* reported.
-
I'm saying that someone on here here said that Her article had friends too scared to let their kids out the house. They were specific. She had responsibility for only what she write, no?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I want to know that too, and I know you know that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.