In mid-July, a large study out of South Korea seemed to suggest that children over the age of 10 spread coronavirus even more than adults do; this update to the same study clarifies otherwise:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/health/older-children-and-the-coronavirus-a-new-wrinkle-in-the-debate.html …
-
-
Yes, it’s a horrible, unnecessary calculus that parents and teachers are being forced to make. (And many women, like myself, will end up pushed out of the workforce.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the other side, are the schools that were refining their virtual teaching offerings early in the summer only to suddenly flip to pushing traditional school—even in areas where cases are rising—after political pressure was applied.
-
Agree. Instead of evidence-driven, careful decision-making that prioritizes kids who'd otherwise be in haphazard, less-safe childcare, we have a polarized response driven by fear or pressure. There is no answer that fits all schools; all kids; all ages; all communities
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
thank you. But concerns about ventilation and not mandating masks on young children is why I’m hesitating on preschool, despite low transmission rates.