You should just engage me directly, @tarahaelle. The article says quite clearly that it’s not clear how much virus is needed or how much airborne transmission contributes to the overall risk. But to not cover all this evidence at all, that is what I would say is irresponsible.https://twitter.com/tarahaelle/status/1293671860429901825 …
-
-
You join many, many others in not checking and not being able to read the evidence correctly. It's a crowded field, so I'm not holding you personally responsible. Similarly, you're now wrong that epi evidence for short-range aerosols isn't there. The opposite. Anyway, that's all.
-
What’s most insulting & patronizing here is your suggestion that I’m unable to read the evidence when I have more expertise & experience in reading epi evidence than you do. You clearly, once again, aren’t reading what I’ve said about short range aerosols.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I did check. I did read the evidence. Did you see my article digging into the evidence for masks for all community wearing? The one that actually deals with the question of universal masks, which this article *did not* deal with?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.