Something I feel not everyone appreciates in stories about airborne Covid-19 spread. Epidemiologists and engineers approach this question with different tools, and different questions. (Correct me if I'm wrong here, please).
-
-
There are pieces to fill with the virology and there is more research needed from the engineering/experimental side—but when the history of this is written, the epidemiology will likely be cited as the strongest evidentiary link for aerosols, just like yellow fever/Aedes aegypti.
-
I'm just baffled how this isn't obvious to people, and how insular the science community in the US/Europe can be, I guess, and ignore extensive and proven expertise elsewhere (and we're behind and don't have the track record on this, so you'd hope for some humility there).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.