"China could have supressed the whole pandemic." <-- There's no evidence for this, and massive evidence against this.
-
-
Replying to @Noahpinion @jbarro
Of course there is. There was fewer than 100 cases at the end of Dec, and their doctors were screaming, and being shut down, that this was a SARS-like coronavirus. They had the genome, hence PCR tests. Lots of places have suppressed epidemics much larger. Nothing to reintroduce.
6 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
No. Li Wenliang warned about it on 12/30/2019. There were already cases outside China by then. And instantly closing down a whole country in response to a few doctors' warnings about a new virus would have been unprecedented and unrealistic anyway. No, Zeynep.
5 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Has there even ever been a case of a novel virus with an R0 of 2 or more being contained by the country where it originated???
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Noahpinion @jbarro
SARS 2003 despite global spread. Taiwan, Hong Kong and New Zealand 2020, among others. Remember reintroductions don’t count. Also the key variable isnt R0, it’s also k, overdispersion. This thing is eliminatable in December of 2020. Absolutely plausible plus actual examples.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Me: "being contained by the country where it originated" You: "SARS 2003 despite global spread" "global spread" means it spread beyond the borders of the country that originated it, Zeynep!!!
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Noahpinion @jbarro
Yes, a much worse scenario! It corresponds to your already escaped hypothetical, Noah. I’m giving an answer to the *strongest* version of your argument.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
No you're not. You gave an example of a virus spreading to other countries before being contained in multiple countries. You dodged the question I asked. Obviously this virus is much harder to stop than SARS, and SARS managed to escape its country of origin. Try again?
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Noahpinion @jbarro
How is it harder to contain a globally spread virus compared to one in just one city with known focal origin? Even Wuhan seems to have eliminated it even after much more spread, then got a reintroduction. Taiwan. Hong Kong. New Zealand. They had a shot. They spent it covering up.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
"How is it harder to contain a globally spread virus" <-- It was NOT contained in the country where it originated. Country of origin requires extra time to figure out what virus it's facing. So you have yet to provide me with an answer to my simple, direct question.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Why? They knew. Doctors knew. They had the genome. They had it nailed very early. Not their first rodeo. If anything, country of origin has a much easier time because they have the focal place of origin. Lower bar for them.
-
-
Again, a refusal to answer my question, followed by unsupported assertions that contradict evidence given elsewhere in the thread, and an incorrect assertion (it's a higher bar because it takes time to identify and understand a new virus). I think I'm done here!
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Also, by the way, I'd like to know why you deleted your earlier tweet declaring that "we have to go for herd immunity", after vigorously and angrily defending that tweet when I criticized it.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.