I find this position compelling but would like to know if others do, as it is a low-data zone. What do others think? tl;dr: Surfaces are not a major source of transmission. @DKThomp writes: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/scourge-hygiene-theater/614599/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share …
-
-
Same here on hygiene routine, then and now too! Thanks for the smile.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s the magic when evidence accumulates

-
... or doesn’t, over time
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think there’s absence of evidence in terms of powering the epidemic via superspreading events. But that doesn’t mean some people don’t get sick. Many cases have unknown origin. A friend’s family got sick (most plausibly) via fomite. Are there no proven cases?
-
In case you’re curious, here’s the friend’s story (shared publicly). They had been isolating 100% at home since early March (5th?). Kid sick ~March 7, husband sick ~March 14th, she got symptoms April 18th. Seems like fomite spread in house would be most likely given timeframes.pic.twitter.com/3WOH1otbH5
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.