A really good thread on the SK transmission study. Given gravity of situation and inherent bias in many study designs I agree that we should make decisions based on what emerges as a consensus. bravo @apsmunrohttps://twitter.com/apsmunro/status/1284794506265722881 …
-
-
I know reporters don't have a lot of power there, but it's a huge issue. (Stats in this study are a little wonky, and we will probably get a clarification. I suspect their definition of "index" and the way they had a little murky measuring of "transmission" will be root of it.).
-
But all that many will remember is a misleading headline and the simplistic takeaway, rather than the clarification that will probably come and the more nuanced interpretation (given so few cases and the lumping of the 10-19 age group). Too high stakes, but this is how it works.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.