A really good thread on the SK transmission study. Given gravity of situation and inherent bias in many study designs I agree that we should make decisions based on what emerges as a consensus. bravo @apsmunrohttps://twitter.com/apsmunro/status/1284794506265722881 …
-
-
They have to be first, get the scoop or mislead people, there are no penalties, and a lot of it has to do with marketing, propaganda, and stock pumping.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The headlines bit is a real problem. And worth noting may not be chosen by the reporter (or oped writer)
-
One of the first sentences of the article is "And those between the ages of 10 and 19 can spread the virus at least as well as adults do." I realize quotes are frequently taken out of context but my impression is that the expert commentary leveraged here could have been better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What about this,
@apoorva_nyc? does seem like the low number of kids in it compared to other groups and the fact that it was only symptomatic makes the findings less of a change than it seemed at first? I know your story got this in, but it does seem like people misinterpretingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.