You may find this argument fails to compel you, but that's the argument.
Plus, the people have so quickly moved the goalposts! "Are you denying he's terrible?" I got told many times today. That is not a good-faith argument; to conflate the principle pseudonyms deserve protecting except on merit is now to defend views of everyone with pen names?
-
-
I think there are multiple layered conversations here. There is a very good and subtle question about how much effort a given writers content justifies for de-anonymizing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.