You may find this argument fails to compel you, but that's the argument.
And "trust us, he's terrible" is no way to make the argument. Anyone who is that dangerous deserves more than a few tweets and screenshots and "trust us". Nobody will survive that process; not the deserving or the undeserving.
-
-
When I thought there was a real case for de-anonymization, I went to the trouble to make the case, at length. I am not even a free speech absolutist but these are not small matters; they are too important to leave to who we happen to know or what one company decides we get to do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tbf, you've seen at least 3 distinct examples I've seen. You've declined to consider them because of their formatting and presentation. It's true, Twitter threads can be hard to follow. But this is an unfair characterization of the argument presented to you.
-
The argument cannot be presented like this. I couldn't do it myself either; it's an important matter. I mean, we have something some people think is supremely dangerous & you want folks to try to figure out twitter threads and screenshots? That is not a world anyone should want.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.