The man in question here *specifically* says, "If my patients read my writing it would make it hard for them to listen to me, and that would impact my business." Folks nod like this is fair, but is it actually fair to patients to suggest they're not allowed to know this?
-
-
We're at a world where many want their ideological opponents or people to be punished by big, unaccountable corporations. This should not sit easy with us. Those big, unaccountable corporations will, inevitably, not do anyone's bidding but their own interests.
-
I want to use any tool I have at my disposal to reduce the various forms of institutional and intellectual racism in Silicon Valley. My record on this is quite consistent. To me, Scott Alexander is a more refined iteration of the project of Mendacious Moldbug.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please tell me what your standard of evidence is other than a direct quote and a link to a reputable archive. I've told you where that screenshot comes from. I've told you which articles defend eugenicists.
-
Because what you just said and the standard you just held don't make sense to me, and I might do what you ask if you can help me reconcile that dissonance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.