I'm concerned how that kind of one-sided decision-making ("your opsec sucks so we will refuse you the right to a pen name") is disastrous for so many people with far fewer connections than him (and much more to lose). Pen names are a basic right they normally respect.
When you throw out words like "fan of eugenics" it kinda weakens your case "skaffen-amtiskaw", especially since you, yourself, are a pen name. I actually know a bit of history about what "fans of eugenics" have done and do not take kindly to the word being used lightly.
-
-
Anybody who wants to write a piece about why he deserves de-anonymization should do so, but as someone familiar with history and current humanitarian crises, I'm so scared people have completely forgotten what eugenics actually means. It's not "I don't like this dude's views".
-
What do you think "Eugenics" means, here? Perhaps the various definitions clashing here are why we can't see eye-to-eye.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scott literally said he likes Eugenics. Here is a comment underneath his "Left Libertarian Manifesto where he directly says he likes Eugenics."pic.twitter.com/uwnz6Pj33C
-
I do not know how it gets more direct than "I like Eugenics," but that fact that he defends and cites scientific racist Murray and his books "The Bell Curve" and "Human Diversity" was a big hint. I don't know what further corroboration you require. Scott is pro-eugenics.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You’ll notice that I constantly engage with people who are pseudonyms on this site. I try hard not to discount people because they don’t use their drivers license name. I’m pointing out defending peoples right express themselves should be obviously valuable to you.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Scott literally and openly advocates eugenics, race and IQ theories and Murray's "The Bell Curve" as a serious work worthy of consideration. These are simple factual claims. Denying them does you zero credit.
-
Denying what? Moving the goalposts doesn't make me trust the rest of the argument. I'm conceding there may be a case; people who think so should make the case. I don't need to read or defend every last pseudonymous blog to defend pseudonyms!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.