he literally published in academia under his real name as the Slate Star Codex guy you could call that a "failure of opsec", or you could just call it publishing Slate Star Codex stuff publicly under his real name his name has literally never been a secret
The *argument* has the same logical structure. I'm obviously not saying miniskirt is bad opsec.
I genuinely don't think we will agree and it's distressing how many people seem to not be able to separate their dislike of the guy from the principle which is terribly important.
-
-
That someone who chooses to use their real name regularly in pursuit of fame, even after being warned by others in their discipline, and also trades on their discipline for credibility despite extant professional guidelines, should be immune from scrutiny? I guess we won't agree.
-
Scrutinize all you want. This isn't that. Wanting NYT to casually and without justification exercise this kind of power should scare anyone who cares about those with less power. Everyone always thinks this will only happen to their ideological enemies/dislikes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.