The man in question here *specifically* says, "If my patients read my writing it would make it hard for them to listen to me, and that would impact my business." Folks nod like this is fair, but is it actually fair to patients to suggest they're not allowed to know this?
-
-
From there, burden would be to argue for an exception, and I think that gets back to the idea that he doesn’t win it in the eyes of many. I guess what I’m just doing is shifting the burden of proof.
-
And I don’t think that’s unfair, given the risk is known, all along you have the ability to take steps to make for your argument better when the time comes, including by acting in ways that make you more sympathetic.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.