You may find this argument fails to compel you, but that's the argument.
And I think people deserve a pen name until there is an argument on the merits. I've defended de-anonymization before (the reddit jailbait/creepshot moderator!). For SLC, he was careless is not an arguments on the merits. I know similar others; NYT respects their pen names.
-
-
I know and respect where you’re coming from and expect we’ll mostly just end up disagreeing, but my case on the merits is that this person is anonymous only when called to account, but freely identifies themselves socially when it suits them.
-
What a bizarre stance this is. You and I talk about all kinds of things in social settings that we would not want to see in the NYT. A meetup is not a deposition
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.