Yeah back in agreement. However, I did make that point in 2011, and why this irritated the exec editor of the NYT. Kinda my point: all this wasn't a complete surprise to everyone but it appeared to shock both the rising tech elite and old gatekeepers.http://technosociology.org/?p=431
-
-
Do you have something written up somewhere that describes the changes you'd like to see in detail? The things I can imagine actually having an impact, (banning retweets/reshares or similar friction) are not things that seem plausible to actually implement or legislate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agree. I've seen more productive work happening at grassroots than can be observed at grasstops. Seems random from afar, but patterns emerge. Practical, positive progress happening in cities, communities, neighborhoods, orgs versus in the national debate. Twitter is a poor proxy.
-
One of the key problematic choices in our politics was to move regulatory power to the Federal level and away from states/cities.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
But yes, we've changed the game-board. What I utterly object is the idea that the people are new kinds of people as a diagnosis. People are ... people. The usual.