There is stuff they could have done at every point, but they never get around to it till it's out of control and mostly as PR exercise. They're in over their heads and yeah it is a thorny problem. But who's gonna really do stuff when you're printing money & minting billionaires?
Yes yes you can. We don't let the most polluting cars win in the market (they would accelerate better, though). We don't use lead in paint (it is an awesome anti-corrosive).
-
-
Also it really doesn't matter if the nucleus was there. It matters if you're fighting wars with automatic weapons or rifles. The nucleus is human nature/comm tech etc. It's there in telegraph, too. Not the point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lead, NOx, particulates are all measurable and concrete. You can define a spec around them. This is different. You are trying to restrict the very property that causes social networks to succeed, and so any gap between the spec and that property will be successfully exploited.
-
That's just not true. Lemme at it, maybe starting ten years ago. The things to restrict were pretty measurable. Not saying you get something neat. We're not going to legislate eating vegetables; we're going to make it expensive to serve ice cream for breakfast lunch and dinner.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.