These graphs *do not* speak for themselves. They correspond to very very different testing regimes. The map is not the territory. We know that cases in Arizona are rising. It's worrisome. But all these comparisons with past New York are not valid and are misleading people.https://twitter.com/maddow/status/1280921756170141696 …
There's both, but sometimes there is one set of reasonable justifications for a particular graphing choice, but people who don't understand it create weird interpretations. It's the way probability models confused the hell out of everyone in 2016 because they were used to polls.
-
-
Indeed. You did make yourself an enemy of ISIS, so I will continue to count on you to tell it like it is. One note: I wish modern writers were better educated. If they were, they would rely less on data and models, and more on judgment and experience. When they did use data, they
-
would be properly discriminatory in its use, so as to increase the clarity and distinctness of their arguments... But that would our writers to also be thinkers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.