Blog to real name is very very very different Google to real name via NYT. One is your existing fan base can find your name. The other is all your future patients *start* with your blog. I cannot understand why NYT gets to make that call with zero justification.
Maybe but they often don't even out pen names as pen names. So it's not just Bansky (but surely he seeks influence too?) I know other pen names where the writer is not that careful, but still got to keep pen name in NYT. So it makes this exception particularly egregious.
-
-
To be clear, we have no idea if it is a nice article or not beyond what he himself has said. And there is also a question of direct influence and how it works. Banksy clearly has and seeks influence, but it isn't generated through direct interaction the way it is on this blog...
-
And the question of the scale of that influence and how it is used should seriously be considered. The L*ss Wr*ong movement of which the blog is a major part has some powerful adherents who are pushing major changes on our culture...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.