So is this why @nytimes went after him? https://twitter.com/can/status/1276533433557151744 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A global amplification platform has no right to mess with whatever his own comfort level is, though. What he does is his business. Doesn't subtract from his rights. That's like "you carry a phone, therefore you get no privacy rights" to me.
End of conversation
-
-
-
His blog post implying his full name is private was a load of crock and after that I have little sympathy left. You want an anonymous identity create one, this situation is someone who started with godawful opsec decided he wants to be anon and we're supposed to respect it? Why?
-
Because you do not want big institutions like NYT or Facebook making those decisions for people. It's not right; it's dangerous and I think many people's thinking is clouded because they don't like the guy. Same threat is true for dissidents you may like.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.