Editors, reviewers: Just because a study is not surprising *to you* does not mean that the study does not provide a novel contribution, when there is no other study out there documenting the "unsurprising" result. We are researchers, not clowns trying to amuse you.
Replying to @ArielOrtizBobea @naomiprof
Also what on earth is wrong with reproducing "unsurprising" or less surprising results? This logic is how we got the reproducibility crisis. Non-novel and null findings is exactly what we need more of! (Without judging whether yours was novel or not! Valuable either way!)
0 replies
1 retweet
24 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.