That’s not without value but also a pretty good setup for groupthink—especially dangerous for domain-smart, wealthy people on the ascendence.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @antoniogm @balajis
Coverage has indeed become fairly one-dimensional (though reporting is always useful as data point). Yet, so much is constantly missed by the industry. It’s... inevitable. Narrow slice of humanity and rapid change in complex system. “Talk among ourselves” is necessarily limited.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
We’re in the middle of a pandemic that has almost the entire world switch to technologically-mediated economic and social infrastructure and yet half the interview with one of its most important figures is asking him about his calendar habits and productivity how-tos? Come on.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
The reason the interview starts there is exactly why you wish it hadn’t: we’re not getting “day in the life” or “how to” coverage from media, who are uninterested. But a lot of people are actually really interested in that and find it helpful.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
I have nothing against such topics! But that’s has little to do with the void I’m talking about. I’m just saying that’s not what I would first ask the man who wrote *that* essay in the middle of *this* pandemic in a country that is possibly permanently losing its global hegemony.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.