I pointed out a few issues here. I don't mind the method (2003 SARS was identified partly due to online rumor tracking) but folks, hang on before making things into big news articles. Ask around. The paper is very short and will likely evolve.. a lot.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1270347472246919172 …
-
-
Oh, my. Here we are. No amount of correction will undo this damage. In my view, even in the most generous reading of this draft, neither claim (searches—maybe, for "diarrhea"—or parking lot counts—which show no trend, just two outlier days) support any such finding, even weakly.pic.twitter.com/B4R89QWKnp
Show this thread -
One article adding more experts questioning that "August COVID in China" study. It got widely reported, tweeted by the president but it's clear that it just doesn't hold up at all. But the correction is disappearing into the void.https://www.thedailybeast.com/experts-doubt-trumps-new-favorite-report-on-covid-19s-earlier-origins …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you look closely at the texture of the image it appears to be filled with rubble. I believe it was not fully built at the time of the photo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those are archived sat images, timestamps should be irregular. Have they considered/normalized irregular weekly holidays in China when comparing a working Thursday afternoon to a non-working Tuesday morning?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.