The virologic samples do not match "citation" is a Chinese propaganda outlet known for trying to deflect the origin of the virus. (No other citation, because this is not known because this research has been censored by China, something widely reported).
-
-
-
With all due respect to the authors, they should take this down and consult with some people. The "evidence" ranges from too-thin-to-publish to not accurate. Not against the method, SARS in 2003 had an actual signal from online rumor analysis, but this isn't it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.