I don't think this is clear. WHO folks made this claim to us in a briefing and, somewhat stunned at the contradiction with existing studies, we persistently asked for the underlying data/studies for clarity. Did not get a response. At this point, I don't know what they mean.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dylanhmorris
No, it's not clear to me they mean never-symptomatics. I listened to the whole briefing; I had this conversation with them before and heard same claim (without clarity despite asking) and I read the guidance where they say something similar. I'm just going to wait till clarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @dylanhmorris
The briefing was basically urging everyone to focus on symptomatic cases. Nor pre- or a-. No clarity. I mean, fine, if that's the case, but we have so many studies suggesting a/pre/sub-clinical symptomatic transmission. If they have some sense of proportions, they should tell us.
2:21 PM - 8 Jun 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.