I've seen many stories/tweets about two hairstylists who exposed 140 people by working for *eight days* while symptomatic. One, this shouldn't happen. Two, where's the follow up? Is anyone actually infected? If not, that should get as much news coverage.https://www.nbcboston.com/news/coronavirus/missouri-hair-stylist-with-covid-19-worked-while-symptomatic-exposed-dozens-of-clients/2130222/ …
-
-
The incubation period for the COVID positive hairstylists in Missouri just ended. The two stylists and 140+ clients all wore masks. Not one person was infected. It's a data point. Let's hope this gets the same attention that the the original alarm got. https://www.springfieldmo.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=6939 …pic.twitter.com/P72zUGK3M1
Show this thread -
Other 100 were quarantined; none seem to have developed any symptoms. It's remotely plausible that there were truly asymptomatic infected case(s) among the 100 but given there were zero among the 45 tested, and these people were on alert, seems unlikely.https://twitter.com/Andres4NY/status/1270457388362055683 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just maybe it has a lot more to do with everyone being outside vs. in a confined space.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That might be more evidence for extremely limited outdoor transmission.
-
The person also ate some meals indoors, took a cab, presumably also used restrooms, maybe locker rooms. One link had the person’s 2-day itinerary.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed... these are prime examples of events that someone needs to be tracing and collecting this data for everyone
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
100% - Why aren't cities/states following up on this? Test/trace everyone and share all the data. If no one/very few are getting infected in these types of environments w/ these types of mitigation efforts, those are excellent data points.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for all your work following up on this!! You're doing so much for our knowledge of transmission rates. Bravo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wasn't clear whether that party attendee might have caught it while vacationing rather than being infectious while there (or both)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/. This is for others, really.... On May 23, the party was outside, so the amount of virus would be dispersed to some degree by wind currents. Windspeed was anywhere from 7 to 14 mph. https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/KCOU/date/2020-5-23 … Temp got up to 85/ deg & RH was 60%. Both good for viruspic.twitter.com/OFI5IgOUv6
-
2/ reduction/ interference. Here's a decent discussion of the seasonality aspects: https://qz.com/1843347/if-covid-19-becomes-seasonal-humidity-could-help-explain-why/ … Temp and RH study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187824/ … Beautiful day so lots of UV knocking down the virus even more. Looked for a UV Index history, but no luck?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.