The parts about @alexstamos were stupid, and I say this as the most charitable description I can muster. Hire some fact-checkers or find reporters who try to interview actual experts and critics rather than a few ignorant attention-seekers. What a shame, the topic is important.
He can, but so what? He should be criticized and the topic examined by a range of independent people with expertise on it. No shortage of folks who wouldn't hold back. Yes, the only person quoted here is not the right person, and a reporter who did their homework would know this.
-
-
Not interested in defending Stamos, he can do that on his own. I'm disappointed that an important topic has been distorted by inadequate reporting and a weird framing that doesn't fit the facts—especially important loss given how important topic is and how zoom is everywhere now.
-
You're making a lot of personal attacks on the journalists who wrote this without giving any real, specific objections to their story. Common infosec toxicity. What distortions? What framing? What errors? You continue to deal in name calling and insinuations instead of facts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.