(This one my followers may not like to hear). Similarly, evidence is not *yet* conclusive on hydroxychloroquine harms or lack of benefit. One Lancet study everyone cites has real issues and is observational only. One unblinded RCT found no harms. Let randomized studies conclude.
-
-
Find the people who didn't; find the people who try to fight their own instincts and ideological priors; find the people who admit errors. The last one might be the most important. Errors are unavoidable. It's the process that works, not any single stance.https://twitter.com/LJAkaar67/status/1268185055546900480 …
Show this thread -
Aaaand, that Lancet HCQ harms study is retracted. Again, please do note that the study had quickly raised concerns among the scientific community. It contradicted existing knowledge. There was an open letter by prominent scientists from top universities.https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1268613313702891523 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
'wait, listen, don't sensationalize' is so hard rn, and yet more important than just about everything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What I find notable and depressing was how eagerly and rapidly scientists (and pundits with some amount of scientific background) were to jump all in on "HCQ is worthless or harmful" -- a real demonstration of the harms and errors of mixing one's politics with one's science
-
I think this is likely to be the true trump 'active measures' plan, in his playbook.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yes, but back at you. can you really say after the protests that wearing masks doesn't encourage people to take more risks?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.