Since I seem to be retweeting about the intersection of religion and SARS-CoV-2, THIS is a religious leader trying to do what's right for their people. And it's also just darned good thinking. Which isn't a coincidence. This isn't the only example by far, it's just a nice onehttps://twitter.com/TheRaDR/status/1264636660664459266 …
-
Show this thread
-
David Andersen 💉 💉 💉 🎉 Retweeted Muhammad Lila
Indoor church services are very high-risk. Lots of people, close together, long time, enclosed area. They represent many of the superspreader events identified thus far. You know an awesome thing about humans? Creativity:https://twitter.com/MuhammadLila/status/1264664165983162369 …
David Andersen 💉 💉 💉 🎉 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
David Andersen 💉 💉 💉 🎉 Retweeted zeynep tufekci
Of almost 300 people at an outdoor worship event, one person infected seven that they interacted with outdoors ... and 23 of the 67 they rode on the same bus with to the event. (!) This was Jan, so probably better distancing would have reduced the 7.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1255579524047220741 …
David Andersen 💉 💉 💉 🎉 added,
zeynep tufekciVerified account @zeynepAnother fascinating study. (Caution: preprint). There was one asymptomatic case in the second of two buses (59 and 67 passengers) to an outdoor worship event. Infections in bus one: zero; bus two: 23. Seven close contacts out of 172 at event also infected. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340418430_Airborne_transmission_of_COVID-19_epidemiologic_evidence_from_two_outbreak_investigations/link/5e87b59ba6fdcca789f10d66/download … pic.twitter.com/wtYbQyM3s1Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread
The seven were apparently extensive contact at the event, which was at a temple (outdoors). So not casual contacts. Wish we had proper contact tracing in the US so we could learn, too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.