This analysis shows relationships from sequencing viral genomes. The main thing to pay attention to is how cases (dots colored by state) cluster. Patches of cases from the same state indicate local transmission. All figures from @nextstrain: https://nextstrain.org/ncov/north-america?c=division&f_country=USA&r=division … 3/14
-
Show this thread
-
These analyses depend on comparison of sequenced viruses and so equitable sampling over geography and time is necessary to make reliable conclusions. This sampling has improved recently, but there are still gaps in sequencing and caution in interpretation is warranted. 4/14
1 reply 68 retweets 610 likesShow this thread -
If we look at New York, we see that most infections appear to derive from an introduction from Europe in mid-February (node on the tree labeled "NY"). This introduction rapidly grew to a substantial epidemic focused in NYC, but frequently introduced to other locations. 5/14pic.twitter.com/VNJsvYMTSF
17 replies 365 retweets 1,096 likesShow this thread -
While if we look at Washington we see an introduction of a lineage from China that drove much of the early outbreak, but then multiple introductions from the NY clade fueling further transmission chains in March. 6/14pic.twitter.com/3nMRXSzLgl
7 replies 242 retweets 843 likesShow this thread -
California is interesting in that like WA, much of the outbreak is fueled by an early introduction of a lineage from Asia and then later cases derived from repeated introductions from elsewhere in the US. 7/14pic.twitter.com/DvSbV9fDSO
6 replies 248 retweets 863 likesShow this thread -
Contrast this with Wisconsin, in which the outbreak appears driven by a large number of separate introductions from elsewhere in the US and Europe. It lacks the early successful introduction seen in NY, WA and CA. 8/14pic.twitter.com/1oEaoeVRcF
11 replies 162 retweets 744 likesShow this thread -
Louisiana has a remarkably focused outbreak in which most sequenced cases appear to derive from a couple closely related introduction events. This outbreak nests within the genetic diversity seen in NY suggesting a possible transmission route. 9/14pic.twitter.com/8gis4qKELV
13 replies 144 retweets 711 likesShow this thread -
Part of the Texas outbreak groups closely with this clade from LA, while other samples from Texas reveal a large number of separate introductions to the state. 10/14pic.twitter.com/6sPMFcYxXN
15 replies 139 retweets 685 likesShow this thread -
Overall, we see substantial mixing of transmission chains across states. This mixing largely occurred during Feb and early March. I'd expect moving forward for there to be more geographically focused transmission chains given reduced travel in the US. 11/14
12 replies 187 retweets 885 likesShow this thread -
I see continued genetic sequencing as potentially illuminating sources of infection and whether further cases within a state are largely the result of local transmission or of repeated introductions from outside the state. 12/14
21 replies 113 retweets 870 likesShow this thread
NYC as mid-February introductions... Fascinating! So many what-ifs. Thanks for sharing this work!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.