This is exactly the kind of situation where you want public health authorities to have cell phone location data, however coarse-grained it is, to create a list of possible contacts. Note that a bluetooth contact tracing app would be (even more) useless in this case https://twitter.com/samdolnick/status/1259491120188456963 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
The kinds of questions we need to answer are not "did I come within an arbitrary distance of an infected person" with seven layers of cryptowank to make sure nobody learns each other's names, but "who was at or near this venue last Saturday, and how can we reach them?"
3 replies 8 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @alexstamos @Pinboard
I am here for the arguments about privacy protections, dangers and sunset clauses but 10,000 (one cell tower) sounds much smaller than 10,000,000 (Seoul) to me. (The other question that
@pinboard asked that I don't know yet is who has this info anyway without oversight?)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The efficacy enhancement seems slam-dunk obvious to me (false positives are inherent to quarantines since the method was invented and don't stop it from working). It would be good to move to protections, worries and implementation questions rather than efficacy distractions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.