“Without peer review, it’s hard to check the quality of the work” But with normal (ie, closed) peer review, it’s just as hard. These takes miss a crucial point: preprints can let us see peer review. Why do we trust black box of journal acceptance more?https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01394-6 …
-
-
Cool to see public health twitter act as a very effective peer review mechanism. Perhaps this is what twitter was designed for after all :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.