On #COVID19 poppycock and pseudoscience
"We need ... all scientists from relevant disciplines to provide simple and shareable content explaining why this hijacking of real research is inaccurate and scientifically dishonest."--@CaulfieldTim @NatureNewshttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01266-z …
-
-
These tales are almost completely wrong and only compound the problem. The Epi Center is papers like the Santa Clara study - well credentialed people push junk science for ideological lines. Ditto the Gupta study from Oxford early on.
-
This coupled with a strong preference in the field for tight models over detailed surveys of the cross country data. There are still well credentialed people push IFR << 1% in G7 despite that being un untenable position for weeks based on SK, DP, italy regions like bergamo.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.