Look, yes, it's hard but we can distinguish against self-serving, profit-driven quackery/actually dangerous advice *and* genuine scientific disagreement. WHO is not The Oracle; the science of a pandemic is evolving. WHO itself is evolving its views.https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1252715349079777280 …
-
-
Okay, deleted top tweet (the quoted person is not against misinformation or quackery). Here's the longer video. I'm still not convinced that YouTube will only remove fake cures if they contradict the WHO and would really like to see some clarification.https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/04/19/inside-youtubes-numerous-policy-changes-during-the-pandemic.cnn/video/playlists/business-reliable-sources/ …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. I'm a he. 2. In the video she shared, in its context, she's talking about fake cures. It's literally right after she talks about fake cures. 3. There are plenty of videos criticizing WHO on YouTube, so CLEARLY you're allowed to contradict WHO. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=world+health+organization+wrong …
-
Sorry! (I get a lot of he comments so karma). I'm going to take down the top tweet (found the longer video).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.