Look, yes, it's hard but we can distinguish against self-serving, profit-driven quackery/actually dangerous advice *and* genuine scientific disagreement. WHO is not The Oracle; the science of a pandemic is evolving. WHO itself is evolving its views.https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1252715349079777280 …
-
-
I get that. I couldn't find the video elsewhere, and be that as it may, I don't want trolls and anti-vaxxers to claim this mantle. There is an evidence-based anti-misinformation case against making WHO into The Oracle while also fighting the quackery.https://twitter.com/ilrosso_/status/1252742782453678080 …
Show this thread -
She says the context is only fake cures, not WHO in general. Also, the original tweeter is clearly acting in bad faith, but I couldn't find the longer video. I will look it up and will either delete and retweet without the first video or better, be wrong!https://twitter.com/KellyScaletta/status/1252748921329397760 …
Show this thread -
Okay, deleted top tweet (the quoted person is not against misinformation or quackery). Here's the longer video. I'm still not convinced that YouTube will only remove fake cures if they contradict the WHO and would really like to see some clarification.https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/04/19/inside-youtubes-numerous-policy-changes-during-the-pandemic.cnn/video/playlists/business-reliable-sources/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here are a whole mess of videos contradicting the WHO: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=world+health+organization+wrong …
-
She should clarify! I've seen such pronouncements get out of hand.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
the original person you retweeted is commenting in bad faith, he is a idiosyncratic troll.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.