Why are universities w/ multi-billion $$ endowments announcing wage cuts/freezes, hiring freezes, letting “non-essential” workers go, etc.? This article, shared by many folks already, goes a long way towards explaining things: https://bit.ly/2X8x8L3
-
Show this thread
-
It's more than that. At Columbia, the Provost said that there are five main sources of income: endowment, fundraising, research funding, clinical income, and tuition—and right now, all are down. But in 2008, losses in the first two were offset by stability/gains in the other 3.
1 reply 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @SteveBellovin @zeynep
Thanks, Steve! One q'n: post 2008-09, have well-resourced universities tried to figure out ways to set aside funds for emergencies and crises? I understood it's not a simple matter of taking a few million from one source to take care of needs across every domain, but still...
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Okay but why is it structured that it can only grow more but never go back to where it was a few years ago in real terms? Princeton says it earned 6% and 14% in the last two years, for example. That's about four billion added in just two years. Why can't they go back to 2017?
3 replies 0 retweets 17 likes
I understand why this is devastating for public universities and those with less funds. But how much would it cost for a university with $26 billion to not lay off staff for one or two years? I get they'd be selling at a loss—but just accepting back to 2017 gives them billions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.