Interesting. Seems some folks used to spreading disinfo without fear of suspension are struggling with the new COVID-19 policies. Another view: Twitter is able to do with COVID misinfo/disinfo what it was unable or unwilling to do with previous political disinfo.https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1243979360920637442 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You're misreading the study. They aerosolized it on purpose using specific machinery. This is the tragedy of not being able to believe medical authorities. People end up trying to read papers directly and not being able to interpret them correctly. So, yeah, nope.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The rule change Twitter announced expanded the “definition of harm” into public health, and seemed well intentioned. *Except* the ground truth they need to use should not be exclusively CDC/WHO health info. Would you say public science with its knowns and knowns is better?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also this: social media content moderation has to distinguish between info on the basic science of the disease, viral propagation, vs info about public health policy directives coming from state agencies. The latter is based on changing data, the former is more definitive. Hard.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.