And I’m telling you that sometimes not everything you read is correct. Please read my piece and then go look at the direct evidence yourself. The message you’re amplifying is not based on evidence but the shortage. Also look at practices in every country that this under control.
-
-
When and if we get through this mask shortage, we will almost certainly have to get used to universal mask usage as we relaxed the lockdown. In this current unfortunate messaging will hurt us very much in the long run because it is not correct.
2 replies 11 retweets 62 likes -
If/when universal mask-wearing is recommended, it will be because the environment/characteristics of the outbreak have changed in a way that makes wearing masks more advantageous than not wearing them. But that’s not where we are at the moment.
6 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
This is not correct, Caroline. The only argument against mask wearing is the shortage. The outbreak is what it is.
8 replies 4 retweets 32 likes -
The question isn't "are masks harmful?", but rather, "under the current conditions, does population-wide mask-wearing confer more benefit than risk?" The answer to that question, at least right now, is yes. Nothing is completely harmless; that's why we assess harm vs. benefits.
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
There's always some incident of someone choking on a mask or having a fatal allergic reaction. That's harm. But does it outweigh the benefits? Probably not. What about if a small % of mask-wearing ppl accidentally increase their risk by improper use? Does that outweigh benefits?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
What about if a small % of mask-wearing ppl accidentally increase their risk by improper use -- at a time when the quality of care is lower b/c hospitals are overflowing with people b/c healthcare workers are getting sick due to the shortage of masks?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Each of the things I have said is true. It's true that we're facing a shortage. It's true that some people use masks improperly and accidentally increase their risk of disease. The risk of improper use is not the *reason* for the recommendation. However, that risk exists.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D Retweeted Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D
Oops, meant to write this here. Not sure how it ended up somewhere else.https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1241518559819374592?s=20 …
Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D added,
Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D @RVAwonkAnd like any other population-wide recommendation, this one is being made on the basis on harm-benefit potential. Perhaps under optimal conditions, the % of people who increase their risk by wearing a mask would be inconsequential. But under current conditions? Perhaps not.Show this thread3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
You are correct on a policy wise measure, I fully agree with you, but you are exposing yourself to criticism when there is no shortage anymore. Then you won't be able to turn around and ask people to wear masks, because that's what the Chinese are recommending right now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That’s right, that’s the biggest harm of this messaging. That’s why I wrote about it. Of course people don’t believe it because it’s not true, and when we need to turn around and tell them to all mask up they won’t believe us because we lost trust.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.