The mask ban has started. However, they don't really use facial recognition software here (though some protesters mention it as a potential future concern). The threat is about old-fashioned recognition (by humans!) and legal and personal consequences.https://twitter.com/derekbruff/status/1180195754591150080 …
-
-
https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/134/2/1021/5298503 … As I say, given this and other papers, its NOT unreasonable to ask if some are there for other than entirely understandable reasons See for instance http://www.davidecantoni.net/pdfs/hk_persistence_20190825.pdf …
-
unless you think *thousands* of people are risking life, limb, and livelihood this way, it really doesn't matter at all whether it's "reasonable to ask.' Not to mention this study was so controversial and criticized when it came out that I recognized it instantly from January.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Theres a story here about the morality and ethics of RCT's ; given the recent Nobel prizes, thats something to look at. Shooting the messenger isn't the answer. Feel free to DM me.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
the evidence, from researchers, is that *at least some* have been incentivised. So, guys, maybe Bloomberg and NYT might investigate *THAT* research. Or you could clutch pearls online.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.